{Single Saints} Inner Beauty Is Not Enough

Ryan Kunz - December 08, 2011

Thinkstock.

Author’s note: Though my message was meant to be encouraging, I failed to clarify a few sensitive points. I didn’t consider that in today’s unrelenting assault of negative body messages, my blog might be misconstrued as an invitation to conform to society’s ideals. We should recognize that we each have a personal best that exists independently of what society tells us, one that should be attained out of a sense of personal achievement, not solely to attract a mate. I was wrong to address the article primarily toward women, because men can be equally guilty of failing to care for themselves. I also realize that one cannot simply look at another person and make an accurate judgment on how well that person cares for him- or herself. Nevertheless, the overall message of this blog remains: “Figure out your personal health and appearance standard, then work toward it.” Please bear that in mind as you read the following.

We’ve all heard that beauty is on the inside, in the eye of the beholder, or somewhere else beyond the realm of the physical. And while I will not argue against the idea that inner beauty—a combination of a good personality, a shining spirit, and other internal qualities—is crucial, I will contend that beauty on the outside should not be neglected.

I’ve noticed a disturbing trend among women. On Facebook and in conversations with girls, I’ve heard girls embrace supposed feminine liberation and tell us that they’re beautiful no matter how they look. Before I have to dodge a flurry of thrown stiletto heels, let me clarify: Yes, you are beautiful. You’re a daughter of God, and don’t let anyone try to convince you otherwise. But . . . you shouldn’t let the “beauty on the inside” argument hinder your quest to achieve your physical ideal. Some girls I know tell themselves it doesn’t matter how they look because they’re beautiful on the inside, and then they just . . . well, let themselves go.

I’m a single male and that reflects in the audience I write to, but regardless of our marital status or gender, we should all take care of our bodies. After all, aren’t they gifts from God? We’re instructed to abstain from tattoos and extra piercings in an attempt to show respect for our bodies, and shouldn’t that respect be extended to how we treat the body itself? We are stewards of our mortal shells, and as such should care for them like the prized possessions they are. 

FEATURED SPONSOR Losing Your Teen?

For those who are still dating, failing to take care of yourself can easily delay association with potential eternal mates. The right person will love you eventually, but it’s your physical aspect that often catches the eye. If you don’t take the time to care for yourself, that doesn’t exactly encourage anyone else to care for you, either. How many people who would love you once they got to know you have passed you over? Maybe you’ve even been the one who’s passed on someone because that person failed to care for his or her God-given body.

If you are truly happy with the body you have, I’m glad for you. We should recognize that none of us is going to have a perfect body, at least not at this stage in our eternal existence. (Or maybe you already do have a near-perfect body. Congrats. You should still keep reading.) Women, we guys will accept that not all of you are swimwear models if you accept that few of us have managed the abs of a certain werewolf from Twilight

I’m sorry if I come across as harsh. There are also plenty of people who go the opposite direction and become Barbie dolls with personalities as bland as the plastic dolls they so resemble. In our journey to improve our inner and outer selves, we should seek balance. We should be satisfied with who we are, but we should strive for healthy improvement. This principle applies to men as well. So how do both genders reconcile this paradox? How do we attain the right body while neither being satisfied with the sub-par nor going too far?

I propose that we find a realistic perception of the person we can become on the inside and outside. Discovering our exact physical potential may take some time, but we can gain a reasonable expectation of the best we can be. Then we simply become content with the progress we’re making toward being our best selves.

President Kimball said, "How nice and easy would it be if we had a magic wand! But we haven’t. You might take a careful inventory of your habits, your speech, your appearance, your weight, . . . and your eccentricities. . . . Take each item and analyze it. What do you like in others? What personality traits please you in others? Are your dresses too short, too long, too revealing, too old fashioned? Does your weight drive off possible suitors? Do you laugh raucously? Are you too selfish? Are you interested only in your own interests?” 

Elder Joe. J. Christensen adds, “The Lord expects us to do the best we can with what he has given us. President McKay said, ‘Even a barn looks better when it’s painted.’” 

Girls (and guys), a little regular exercise and some healthy eating habits will be a good start toward becoming that reasonable paragon. Go running. Take a racquetball class. I think you’re capable of filling in the rest of this list yourselves. I really believe that as we all set attainable physical goals and work to reach them, we can be satisfied both with ourselves and with what we’re becoming. 

What do you think? Am I off base? Do I have unreasonable expectations for girls?

Please remember to be kind in your comments. The writer of this article, whether you believe his opinions are correct or not, has feelings too.

© LDS Living, 2011.
Comments 47 comments

macho_mz said...

06:36 AM
on Dec 08, 2011

Report Abuse

I agree about a need for a balance. Whether we like it or not, even the most kindhearted person will make assumptions based on first impressions. This goes for guys and girls. When we look sloppy, people will assume that extends to other aspects of our life. I don't think that means that ladies need to wear make-up 24x7, but it can be as simple as running a brush through your hair, tucking your shirt in, etc. When we don’t take five minutes to put ourselves together, it looks like we don’t care. People assume that apathy extends beyond how we are dressed. Taking care of our bodies is important too. It's not just about appearances; the Word of Wisdom is a commandment. It means more than not drinking or smoking- it includes eating a moderate diet and keeping our bodies fit. I don’t need a guy to have a 32 inch waist and a six-pack, but if I see him living on junk food and pop, it makes me wonder what other commandments he sees as "less important."

texasmommy said...

06:36 AM
on Dec 08, 2011

Report Abuse

I agree. I do not have a home that "looks like the wheels were yanked off"- it is a 'luxury model' manufactured homw (double-wide) with tons of upgrades, taped & textured sheetrock walls (instead of that ugly panel stuff), energy-efficient features, etc... it's beautiful. It is set on a permanent foundation. But it doesn't change the fact that it is a manufactured home, same as any other double-wide, and it appraises for the same amount per square foot as homes that are made much more cheaply, which means that it has depreciated a lot since we bought it a few years ago. The land has appreciated a little bit, but not much. We cannot sell the house now because it is worth less than we owe, and a lot of people are going through that right now with 'normal' homes, but it's embarrassing because home values have held very stedy in my area (not rising, not dropping), and it's only manufactured homes that have lost valuie. Sigh. We have it rented out now, for $300 less than our mortgage payment. It's a financial drain for us, and we can't even get rid of it! People buy manufactured homes with the idea that even though the house value *might* depreciate, the land will appreciate more than enough to make up for that. Um, yeah right. It might happen sometimes, but I think it's the exception rather than the rule. Especially here in semi-rural Texas where there are an abundance of cheap manufactured homes on acreage... and lots of available land!

cwhiteva said...

06:57 AM
on Dec 08, 2011

Report Abuse

The view is not too harsh. However, the most important reason for achieving our own individual physical ideal (which will look different for different people) is so that you can feel good about yourself, stay healthier, have more energy, and physically be able to do the activities that are part of enjoying life. With male-female demographics (particularly if one factors in church activity and age), it is unrealistic to think that working on outer beauty as well as inner beauty will necessarily make a difference in finding a romantic partner. But it certainly can make a difference in living a happy life!

nate said...

08:06 AM
on Dec 08, 2011

Report Abuse

This posting is definitely sexist, but could easily be improved by pointing out that men too, look pretty awful these days in their over-sized suits and cheap casual wear. Why do they get a free pass? And why should looking good be all about snagging a mate? That's pretty sexist as well. Women (and men) should try to look as good as they can because clothing is a form of communication, and when you look slovenly on the outside, you are communicating that you are also a bit casual and lax on the inside. That might not be true, but it's the message that comes across none the less.

malfred said...

09:08 AM
on Dec 08, 2011

Report Abuse

I appreciate articles targeted at the single demographic of the church which tackle real issues in a honest way. I am sure that people will comment and attack the author of being sexist or insensitive etc. I am a divorced 40 something female single parent who has been out there in the LDS singles scene for a few years. And I think this author is 100% correct. I have heard more than once the sentiment that men should look beyond the physical appearance of someone and see the inner person. And while that is a worthy and righteous thought, my observation of reality is that men are visually oriented. And no amount of Facebook posting, conference workshops and girl power is going to change that. So the idea in this article that you seek to be the best you inside and out is fantastic!! I am not advocating the extreme makeovers which involve surgery, but I am suggesting that the concept of being physically fit(applies to all ages), dressed appropriately and taking care with your hair and makeup only improves your self-esteem and your chances of attracting that person who will then have the time to get to know the inner you. I know that women especially get very defensive when this topic is discussed or real facts are spoken. But it is reality and not talking about it or pretending that this dynamic does not exist is really doing a disservice to singles. And I agree that just because you do all these things, does not mean that will change your single status. But I have witnessed and do know that changing who you are on the outside often changes the inner you for the better as well. Change is not easy, I know because I have walked this road ( I have lost 60lbs.since my divorce). But as you begin to change, people around you notice and help to motivate you even more.

katcool said...

10:07 AM
on Dec 08, 2011

Report Abuse

I find it ironic that "Inner Beauty is Not Enough" was sent on the same day as "BYU-Idaho to Ban Skinny Jeans?". Quite the mixed message, don't you think? I've met plenty of "beautiful" people who are not so pretty on the inside (and vice versa). As the old adage says, "you can't judge a book by its cover". How many people have been dismissed because they didn't line up with someone's idea of perfection? Doesn't the Bible say something in Matthew 25 about "the least of these"?

saycheese said...

10:16 AM
on Dec 08, 2011

Report Abuse

This blog post is DEFINATELY sexist. And too apologetic. There is a whole world outside of the LDS church that the LDS church doesn't see. And yes, I am LDS. However I am not the sterotype. People get together because of PHYSICAL attraction. So the answer to this "problem" is to seek out and date your equal. If you are a fat and dumpy geek, look for another fat and dumpy geek. Too many of the "gamer" type sit behind a computer screen and dream of the super model. Got news for ya, most likely not gonna happen. SEEK OUT AND DATE YOUR EQUAL. Stop the fantasy, deal with reality.

brentdowdle said...

10:19 AM
on Dec 08, 2011

Report Abuse

I totally agree. However, when looking at the physical self, and the personality, let us always remember that the eternal part of a person IS their spirit. It is with that spirit, in a perfected, immortal body, that we will spend eternity, NOT with the corruptible body we look at. With that said, the Lord expects us to be wise stewards over our bodies, and keep them fit, to the size of our spirits that give them life. Excellent points, though!

orange_starfish said...

10:49 AM
on Dec 08, 2011

Report Abuse

This sort of attitude within our church makes me sick to my stomach. It's bad enough to get the message that women aren't beautiful enough from the world, they don't need to getting it from church sources as well. Church should be about love and acceptance but increasingly when I go to church all I see is people like you, judging others for the way they look, how successful they are, and worst of all how righteous they are. Take the beam out of your own eye first. What would Jesus do? I doubt he'd be writing blog posts about things like this. Shame on you for your horrible attitude towards women, and shame on LDS Living for sinking to the level of a dime store rag and joining the masses of fashion magazines telling women that they need to live up to the male ideal of feminine beauty.

momof2 said...

01:06 PM
on Dec 08, 2011

Report Abuse

@orange_starfish: I think you missed the point of the article. The author rightly affirmed that we should take care of our bodies and be accountable for our own health and well-being. He's saying that being our best selves, men and women, will help us to be happier and more ljkely to associate with the kind of people we really want to be around, whether in friendship or a more serious relationship.

barbara said...

04:59 PM
on Dec 08, 2011

Report Abuse

I'm not single, but I read lots of different stuff! I agree that some women in the church look like slobs. Perhaps it is sexist to say that they need to shape up and make more of an effort to look pleasing. The men do too. On the other hand, we went to a family gathering last week, and one of the relatives was so heavily made up and dyed, etc. that she looked like a wax figure. Her daughter looked just horrible. Her beautiful. natural face was lost in the dark, yellow fake tan--the totally one-shade dyed hair and heavy eye makeup. It seems that for efvery member who looks like a slob, there is at least one woman who looks over-the-top fake. Usually it is the over bleached hair, very fake tan, long fingernails with little pictures on them, Do they ever really look at the whole picture in the mirror? Some of them look like witches.

danieldot9 said...

06:39 PM
on Dec 08, 2011

Report Abuse

Take care of yourself, work to be healthy and erase the phrase "ideal appearance" from your vocabulary! The cultural ideals of appearance have done horrible damage to women and we need to abandon them. Any notion that a woman's value is, in any way, related to her physical appearance is satanic.

looking-up said...

09:00 PM
on Dec 08, 2011

Report Abuse

When I was dating, I didn't have an "ideal guy" in mind. But if a guy looked like he hadn't washed his clothes in months, and treated potato chips like they were vegetables - I worried that he would neither support or appreciate my efforts to take care of myself and be healthy. I wondered what example he would set for the children we might have one day if I married him. If I was out in the evening, would he make sure the kids ate a good dinner or would it be cereal and chips-again? This may sound extreme, but it's honest.

prettywoman said...

10:47 AM
on Dec 09, 2011

Report Abuse

Ryan, you always dress to impress and because of that, I support this article. I wonder what your columns will be like when you're married? Hmmm.

miri said...

12:46 PM
on Dec 09, 2011

Report Abuse

Um... Yes. Yes, this article is off base. Yes, you have unreasonable expectations for "girls" (I think you mean women). And I found this article so distasteful that I had to create an account here just so I could comment on it. We absolutely should take care of our bodies. And taking care of our bodies should have exactly two motivations: being healthy and respecting ourselves. The end. The instant you introduce appearances for the sake of attracting a mate--which was done even before this guy's sexist blathering began, by the fact that the article comes from the "Single Saints" series--you lose credibility with me. Yes, I know reality is that people are shallow. And I think if we want to change that reality, we have to stop pandering to it. Let's stop blaming society for that weakness, and own up to the fact that if we allow ourselves to judge others based on their appearances, then WE are doing something wrong. And please--let's stop having men write articles about how women must be careful to avoid "letting themselves go." There is no circumstance in which this is okay.

lovelylauren said...

01:47 PM
on Dec 09, 2011

Report Abuse

This is really disappointing. Women are bombarded with messages that they need to be beautiful to please a man. From movies, magazines, billboards, well-meaning parents and friends. And now this too? This is just pathetic.

bankofindoff said...

02:10 PM
on Dec 09, 2011

Report Abuse

There are a couple of things about this article that annoy me - first, it's the assumption that physical attractiveness is tied to weight. This might be the author's hangup, but does not speak for every man or woman. Second, it's the implication that a person that is overweight is not only unattractive, but is breaking the commandments. So not only is an overweight person physically unattractive, they are morally unattractive as well. There are so many reasons a person can be overweight, and many of those reasons have nothing to do with a lack of commitment to the Word of Wisdom. This article is trying to coat an attempt to shame overweight people with a false tone of concern, and is unworthy of LDS Living.

jice said...

02:43 PM
on Dec 09, 2011

Report Abuse

This is a touchy subject, but I do think it's important doe all of us to take care of ourselves and make an effort to look nice. That doesn't mean women need to be a size 2 or wear the brand new line of clothes, but try to look your best with what you have... For you! If a single guy sees a girl who doesn't take care of herself with normal grooming and hygiene then he will probably assume that she won't be taking care of her future children either. Same goes for guys... If a guy never brushes his teeth or always has wrinkled clothes the the girl would assume he wouldn't make a good example as a parent. My husband often thanks me for making sure the kids look presentable, and we buy second hand a lot of the time... So it's not about money or vanity or keeping up with the jones's... it's about respect.

fran_patterson said...

07:41 PM
on Dec 09, 2011

Report Abuse

Well, you're still single...So, considering how your article is presenting outer beauty as an important factor to snatch a mate, I wonder what the issue is with you. How come you're still single? Too fat? Too slovenly? Did you not paint your barn sufficiently? Or is it the girls? Really, this article is dumb. Sorry, was that too harsh? The fact is - YES, we should take care of our bodies. But what on earth makes you think that you can judge other peoples' efforts of "taking proper care of their bodies" by looking at them? Oh, would that be because your notions of "proper care" are likely the only right ones? How would you know if someone isn't regularly exercising, but is still overweight because of medications they're taking, or a thyroid problem? How would you know that someone isn't dressing fashionable to the best of their budget and knowledge? In the end, dear Ryan, one thing becomes apparent from the article. As much as you would like to come across as deeply thinking, and genuinely caring, and trying to be balanced, - you're not. You're judging others by their looks, making assumptions about their lives, thoughts, efforts, goals and desires. It's pretty shallow, really. But as a happily married woman, I'll tell you what - if you get over your shallow self, and simply treat everyone as a child of God, someone simply beautiful because they're human, you may end up not overlooking ANYONE because of their looks. And then you may end up falling in love with someone, despite their looks. Or, someone will fall in love with you, despite your looks. Because at that point, who you are will be worth more than any look you may ever have. Looks aren't constant, you know. Even when you try and do look your very best.

senoni81 said...

11:33 PM
on Dec 09, 2011

Report Abuse

3 things. #1 - Beauty if in the eye of the beholder. What you consider beautiful is not everyones view #2 - Beauty does not last forever. What happens after your perfect size 4 wife snags you and you get married... THEN oops she has a baby and an ugly c-section scar and is 30 lbs heavier? Beauty fades with age and experiences so to put any stock into something that is short lived is foolish. #3 - I work out 4-5 times a week for at least an hour. I train hard in a martial arts gym. I try my best to eat whole grains, fruits, vegetables, and lean meats. I try to buy decent looking clothes but not pay very much for them. I try to do my hair and makeup every day but that doesn't usually happen since I am at home with my 7 month old all day long and she comes first. .... ALL this and you would think I look amazing huh? Well I weigh almost 220 and I wear a size 18 jeans. So looking at me you would never know that take a lot of pride in taking care of myself and my family. At the end of the day my husband think I am beautiful, extra weight, no makeup, and pajama pants and all. That is what real love is. That is what people talk about when they mention inner beauty. Instead of looking for a trophy wife maybe men should start looking for a righteous woman with child bearing hips and a kind soul. Then maybe you wouldn't be single;)

moss said...

12:04 AM
on Dec 10, 2011

Report Abuse

Who is this article aimed at? That one girl in your ward that doesn't brush her hair? It seems like most people, especially women, display a passable level of self-maintenance. What do you want from them? My guess is you think they are too heavy. And if having outer beauty is so gosh-darned important to finding a mate, then how do you explain all the frumpy married ladies in my ward? Perhaps they should be called to repentance?

vinniecat said...

09:29 AM
on Dec 10, 2011

Report Abuse

Gee, doesn't the title just say it all? How many beautiful people do you know? Maybe the girls that "just let themselves go" actually just let the world go. Who are you to tell any woman what that beauty should mean? Such a narrow, worldly piece! I'm really disturbed at LDS Living for publishing such nonsense.

beauty_redefined said...

02:57 PM
on Dec 10, 2011

Report Abuse

"But...you shouldn’t let the “beauty on the inside” argument hinder your quest to achieve your physical ideal." This is a clear and blatant example of media beauty ideals being conflated with health and shockingly enough, righteousness. Has the author stopped to think about where these "physical ideals" came from or how who they benefit? They physical ideals that dominate media and public consciousness today are unlike any the world has ever seen before, thanks to the wonders of Photoshop, pornography, cosmetic surgery and the normalization of extremely, thin, tall white "idealized" bodies to sell any product you can think of - all based on creating an unachievable ideal to drive profit. No one will ever reach those "physical ideals," and that's their purpose. The author is equating "taking care of your body" with achieving "physical ideals," which is a dangerous lie. The idea that one's health and fitness can be perceived from their appearance is another of those profit-driven myths designed to sell $61 billion in weight-loss aids in 2010 alone, and a 4446% increase in the nubmer of cosmetic surgeries performed in the last decade (with 92% on women). Countless medical studies prove that a person's appearance, specifically their body weight and shape (including their BMI) are an extremely poor indicator of their health or physical fitness - unless they are at a dramatic extreme on either end of the weight spectrum. Articles like this do NOT help SLC move away from it's title as 'Vainest in the Nation,' as ranked by Forbes magazine based on studies showing we spend 10 times as much as other cities of comparable size on all beauty products, we have more plastic surgeons per capita than ANY city in the nation, including L.A. and NYC, and other shameful stats. For the attitude in this article to be perpetuated here, especially through the lens of LDS values, is ironic and shameful. This is literally the last place in the country that women need to worry any more about their appearances. We have more than enough reminders at every turn that we aren't hot enough, and that if we aren't hot enough, we better run on the treadmill longer and buy more makeup and wear better clothes in order to get that way, and that aren't worthy of love until we drop another 30 lbs to look a LITTLE more like the "physical ideals" you are invoking. We don't need any more reminders. What we need a reminder of is that our perceptions of beauty and ideal bodies - even healthy bodies - are skewed by forces that no other generation has had to deal with. Taking care of your body is a wonderful responsibility that we all must take seriously. But if we do it in the name of looking hotter or to get more dates, we're being motivated by external factors that don't provide long-lasting motivation and only seek to propel more body hatred in this world that is being CRIPPLED by body hatred. You might scoff at messages telling women they're beautiful and that there is more to be than eye candy, but you should also know that girls and women who feel OK about their bodies, regardless of what they look like, are proven to take better care of their bodies through physical activity and healthy eating choices. Those who are disgusted with their bodies (as you seem to be reminding women they should be) are much more likely to lead sedentary lifestyles and make poor eating choices. We at BeautyRedefined.net will continue convincing girls and women that they are worth more than what their bodies look like. Think more critically about your ideals, and then get back to us.

beauty_redefined said...

03:11 PM
on Dec 10, 2011

Report Abuse

*446%. P.S. - I realize my last comment is shamefully long. Sorry. I also want to note that I don't mean to direct anger toward the author, since he's not at fault for this distorted way of thinking. But it takes effort to think critically about this stuff, and helping people to do that is a promising goal.

anjed said...

04:30 PM
on Dec 10, 2011

Report Abuse

Ryan, I suppose I can understand where you're coming from with this article, but I think you're misguided. Isaiah taught that when Christ would come "he hath no form nor comeliness; and when we shall see him, there is no beauty that we should desire him." (Isa. 53:2) - or as WW Phelps put it so eloquently "no apparent beauty that man should him desire." With those few words Isaiah taught us the importance appearance alone (especially appearance based on standards created by the world at that time) will play in our salvation, righteousness, or success in the eternal world. It won't. Which means that if we are judging someone based on appearance - even if it's only a fleeting judgement on whether or not you'd like to talk to a woman - is not Christlike nor what Christ Himself taught. Second, Paul taught that we are to "work out [our] own salvation". Whether or not a woman lives up to your standards of beauty is her decision and only affects her. There are so many better things we could be thinking about and doing to work towards a more celestial existence, discussing how other women should be living their lives just doesn't seem like the best option.

vasper said...

05:42 PM
on Dec 10, 2011

Report Abuse

A Person Should Take From This Article Whatever Best Serves Their Needs.--If A Person Expects Anthing Less Than The Best...That's Exactly What They'll Get: Less Than The Best

amaren said...

10:27 PM
on Dec 10, 2011

Report Abuse

is this column serious? tell me ryan, just where do you get off telling women how to dress and what they should do with their bodies? and you are talking explicitly to women here. if the column was 'people should dress nicer' i'd feel better about it, although it would still be shallow. but no, you are addressing women. is there anything else you'd like to let us know? cause gosh, my notebook is out and ready, just waiting for your pearls of wisdom. someone up thread mentioned that this article is too apologetic...shouldn't the fact that you have to apologize and qualify so many times tell you that what you're saying is not okay? no woman (or man) owes you anything when it comes to how they present themselves, and it is certainly not acceptable for you to comment and advise us from on high how better to please you. our bodies are our own, we can do with them what we like, and if we don't look good enough for you to date us, it's hard to imagine that as much of a loss. how about you focus on how to make YOURSELF a better person, and give the rest of us a break?

box said...

01:21 AM
on Dec 11, 2011

Report Abuse

I wish the author of this article would have been more direct in identifying exactly what it is about the women in his life that he finds so dissatisfying--those who have "let themselves go" and "fail to take care of themselves." If the singles wards he attends are anything like the many I have been in, they are full of attractive women who bathe regularly, put on their makeup, comb their hair, and wear clothes from the current decade. I am left to conclude from such phrases as "attain the right body," that what he's really saying here is that he thinks the women in his ward are fat and he doesn't want to date them until they slim down a bit. A little more specificity on his end would have been enlightening to those of us down here in the peanut gallery. I get the sense that those in the "right on, dude!" camp and those in the "who is this shallow guy?" camp might both concede some ground if any of us had the faintest idea exactly what the author's talking about here. As it is, if I have to err, I'll err on the side of speaking up for the women. The author demonstrates quite aptly how little insight into the female psyche he possesses. I don't think I've ever met a single woman who, brainwashed by the evil feminists, decided to stop exercising and brushing her teeth because she was beautiful on the inside and that was good enough. Most women I know beat themselves up about how they look constantly. I do not think men understand how rampant body hatred is among women. If I'm being honest, I'll admit that "beautiful on the inside" is something we tell ourselves in an effort to feel better--because a barn's still a barn, even if you paint it. I cannot explain to you how discouraging it is for a woman who waxes and moisturizes and bleaches and plucks and jogs and diets, but still falls short (especially in her own eyes) of her "physical ideal" to hear--again--that men are primarily interested in their outsides. There is a reason we have Relief Society lessons about self-worth regularly. I think I speak for many women when I say that there are times when no matter how much I've heard it and how much I want it to be true, I don't believe for a second that I'm beautiful in any way at all. I can already here the author saying "That's not what I meant," and "you missed the point," but for women who are already beaten down by the media into believing that none of their efforts will ever be good enough, that is what they hear. This article would have been stronger, and less incendiary--if the author had made a gender-neutral argument about health and hygiene. Though he quotes a few latter-day prophets on the subject of self-improvement, I think he will find, as others have pointed out, that many of the sentiments in this article run contrary to Christian teachings about love, mercy, and the nature of God. I for one, hope that in the resurrection, when our bodies are restored to us in their perfect form, that it doesn't mean we'll all be swimsuit models and that the author will get the six-pack he's always wanted. I hope it means we'll be healthy--that those who suffer from illness and pain will be free of it, that those who have lost limbs will have them restored--and that in a Celestial world we'll be kind enough and enlightened enough to see the infinite and magnificent range of beauty in God's creations, not the limited view we have here. I hope we can try a little harder to achieve that in this life instead of just accepting the world's view of beauty.

ladyblu22 said...

06:13 PM
on Dec 11, 2011

Report Abuse

I have been married 25 years. When I was in the dating game we made sure we were clean and attractively dressed. But if you didn't have that 'spark' you didn't date the guy. At least, I didn't. Is my husband outrageously handsome? I look in his eyes and I melt. Am I model thin? No. Was I popular in high school? No. I was shy and insecure. Was I pretty? Some thought so. But I waited for the one who 'filled my soul - was my other half'. How did I find him? Someone introduced us at his parents house. You never know when you will find that man of your dreams - you never know what he will look like. But if ever you look in someone's eyes and see eternity, THAT is the man for you. Don't limit yourself to church activities - he may not be a member yet! As far as this article goes - obviously the right girl hasn't seen eternity in HIS eyes and he's not looking into anyone's EYES! Good luck, ladies. The right guy for you is out there.

ryansux said...

09:01 PM
on Dec 11, 2011

Report Abuse

I have considered being as tasteful as everyone else in this blog. I have contemplated just giving Ryan an out because he is a guy. It really isn’t his fault, right? He will always be ignorant and biased on this topic so that is why I should just let it go. But sometimes you have to be loyal to womanhood and say the truth – Ryan, you are devastatingly pathetic excuse for a human being and you will never know the meaning of this life if you believe what you wrote. You are the reason there are women who throw up after they eat, spend hours at the gym, and get botox in their early 20’s. You are the reason we look in the mirror and give emphasis to our flaws instead of our spirits. In relief society, we have those lessons on self-worth for times like these. The times when we need to remember our looks do not define us; our hearts and our minds do. It is because of those lessons and the love of my Heavenly Father that I can tell the difference between what is true and what is false. You have just written an article that is false from beginning to end. We are more than a dress size; much more than a superficial exterior of make-up and hair. I am still angry with your words but part of me feels very sorry for you. I am very sorry you felt the need to publish such thoughtless words because you actually believed they were true.

mso said...

09:10 PM
on Dec 11, 2011

Report Abuse

...and please call us "women," not "girls." Many women consider being called a "girl" when they are an adult as being a bit condescending. If you reread the comments above you will notice that they call themselves "women." The female equivilent to "guys" is "gals," the male equivilent to "girls" is "boys." How often have you been called a "boy" since you became a young adult?

kater said...

11:08 PM
on Dec 11, 2011

Report Abuse

Obviously, Mr. Ryan Kunz has never been pregnant.

rexbasior said...

12:16 AM
on Dec 13, 2011

Report Abuse

ryan... sorry buddy. you had the audacity to say that nobody's perfect and somehow got called on it. best of luck with mending the fence on this one. in the meantime, i'd like to thank the commenters for helping me understand that it really is the inner beauty that counts -- the shrill, argumentative, mobbish, negative inner beauty. apologies in advance.

anothermormongirl said...

09:09 AM
on Dec 13, 2011

Report Abuse

I'd like to see an article addressing the fact that guys need to take better care of their futures as providers. Every singles ward I've been to I see all these attractive women with college educations and often advanced degrees, they have careers and their lives together and they served missions. The majority of the men in singles wards have maybe a 4 year degree, but usually haven't finished it. They don't have careers or career goals, they don't do their home teaching, and they’re fat themselves yet think that Jennifer Anniston is definitely in their league. So my question is why would an attractive, college educated, calling magnifier, career woman, and temple going woman want to date a man who doesn't do any of the same? I'm speaking in generalizations of course, but among the YSA women in the church I know, many feel this way.

twitterpat said...

09:14 AM
on Dec 13, 2011

Report Abuse

In my experience, single LDS men can throw a rock and hit 20 gorgeous, single LDS women and yet, they still remain single. So I have a hard time believing that's the problem. I feel like when I'm on a date with an LDS guy that they look past me, as if not wanting to miss something better that might come along. It's insulting! I am constantly hit on by non-LDS men who tell me I'm gorgeous, smart, amazing, talented, etc. and they can't figure out why I'm still single. Maybe I'm looking in the wrong "pool." LDS people in general are always taught to be better, work harder and to strive for perfection. When it comes to dating, I often feel like that is taken to such extremes that it is impossible to ever be what these men are looking for. I'm sure many LDS men feel the same about LDS women. My frame of reference is "older" (25-40) LDS singles (single, as in never-married, not "divorced.") I'm not saying women and men should not strive to be presentable and healthy, I'm just saying the problem is soooo much deeper than that.

superjae5 said...

10:05 AM
on Dec 13, 2011

Report Abuse

I think most of the women are missing the point of the article. He's not saying, "Unless you're Barbie, you're worthless." He's saying be willing to take a hard look at yourself. I know several overweight women who have admitted to themselves they are overweight and instead of trying to dress like skinny girls or pretend they aren't fat, they find styles that suit their body type. They're still big, but they make themselves look good. I think his point is be your best self, whatever your body type. I had a friend who wouldn't buy new clothes until she "lost some weight." She was very self-conscious about her weight. The stuff she wore wasn't flattering and kind of outdated. When I finally convinced her to get new stuff, she looked better and she could see it. I see A LOT of women who have truly "given up." I think these are the women he's speaking to. I don't just mean weight, I mean you can tell they don't spend more than a few moments on their appearance daily. People can tell if you are taking care of yourself. You don't have to wear 20lbs of makeup, you don't have to be Barbie, but if you're not making any effort--people notice. This goes for guys too, and to me that was easily stated. Athletic outdoorsy girls probably won't be interested in a guy who can't join them in athletic outdoorsy activities. If that's the girl or guy you want, then that's the lifestyle you have to take on. Otherwise, don't point your fingers at the girl/guy who won't consider marrying you because your lifestyles are different. I think saycheese had it right, date people who share the same lifestyles as you.

dcm2 said...

12:16 PM
on Dec 13, 2011

Report Abuse

First, I'm assuming your target audience is women, so I'm unclear why you're referring to us as "girls." Also, what standard of beauty are you referring to? What's your alternative to super models? We're created as individuals to all look differently--not to fit a mold. Didn't Peter say, "God is no respecter of persons?" In some cultures, beauty means different things. Please look outside the LDS culture in the Wasatch Front for examples of beauty. Men and women are attracted to different shapes and sizes. I'm disappointed that LDSLiving would publish this worldly view. Please stop the perpetuation of body hatred.

fran_patterson said...

01:55 PM
on Dec 16, 2011

Report Abuse

Ryan, it's nice that you clarified yourself. However, I think if I keep your clarifications in mind as I read your article, your "author's notes" basically negate everything you've written. They're opposing ideas. But hey, I appreciate the effort. I'm sure it was unpleasant to get all the backlash from your article. However, it's an extremely sensitive and difficult topic for many women, who're under constant pressure to look a certain way. I hope this is more clear for you now. Good luck in achieving your personal best.

beccabanfield said...

09:54 PM
on Dec 17, 2011

Report Abuse

100 percent agree with your article! Rock and roll!

barbara said...

01:43 AM
on Dec 18, 2011

Report Abuse

I must comment on Beauty redifined: You said Utah is the vainest place in the U.S. and one of your 'facts' was because there are more plastic surgeons per capita than any other place. We came to SLC from several states away for some needed plastic surgery forour young son because some of the best plastic surgeons live there. And some of the reasons the best plastic surgeons live in Utah is because it has a cheaper, better place to raise a family. The cost of doing business is cheaper. So, people come from other states because it is cheaper (either for them or for their insurance companies). So, not all the patients are locals.

sarajane said...

01:26 PM
on Dec 19, 2011

Report Abuse

I was thinking, long before this article that the emphasis on weight and appearance is part of Satan's plan to distract us from our true purpose. At the end of the day, actions do speak louder than words and those who take 'care' of themselves are sending just as obvious messages. One word - Mahana.

patstlouis said...

08:37 AM
on Dec 20, 2011

Report Abuse

This is a pet issue for me. I consider maintaining a normal weight and consistent cardio mixed with strength training to be a natural extension of the Word of Wisdom. I deeply believe that the Church compels us to live a healthy life as free of ALL vices -- and gluttony and laziness are vices. To be prescription-free at 54 years old is one of my most-cherished blessings.

trigotan said...

10:48 AM
on Jan 24, 2012

Report Abuse

The issue here should not be appearance, it should be responsibility. A person should live a healthy lifestyle to take care of the temple that the Lord has given him or her. By living a healthy lifestyle a person is better able to care for a family, and less likely to suffer medical problems to will adversely affect a family. If I am born with a genetic medical condition, that can be considered a trial from the Lord. If I develop a medical condition because I don't make sacrifices to take care of myself, that is simply irresponsible behavior. I myself might be considered unattractive to some (or most) women because I have a big nose and more hair on my back than on my head. Regardless, I still make an effort to maintain a healthy lifestyle and control the things that I can control.

srae said...

08:43 PM
on Jan 24, 2012

Report Abuse

I think my biggest problem with the idea discussed here is that it justifies judging a book by it's cover and LDS guys seem to be very picky judges. I go out with my nonLDS friends and I'm asked out probably 1-2 times a month, but from LDS guys I'm told that they judge on weight and makeup/nails/jewelry. I have a body that will never be a size 2 because I have so much muscle tone (15% body fat, but fall into the overweight category). If "healthy" and taking care of yourself are the REAL criteria then I would be dating a lot more than I am.

reesecup said...

11:18 PM
on Jan 28, 2012

Report Abuse

I wish a woman would write an article about LDS single men. It was stated by Brigham Young if your over the age of 25 and not married you are a menace to society. Nothing was said to this extent to the woman of the church. Males, U need to care for yourselves also. U need to clean up after yourself and be prepared to be a bread winner for a family. All too often the LDS men that I have dated had no goals and lived off credit cards and they lived with mommy and daddy. We like clean cut men, and who take time to notice the small things. The biggest turn off is a guy in his mid 30's to 40's and is still playing video games. In my experiences in dating LDS men they seem to be immature. Also Men shower and watch your weight. We woman hate big fat bellies!! I find this article distasteful and shallow!! I take care of myself and I'm not willing to settle for a shallow man like u who wrote this article!!

limagoose said...

05:54 PM
on May 13, 2012

Report Abuse

Um, it isn't that this is off-base, but as some have already pointed out, it is a pretty lopsided view. From the view of the LDS women (thin or otherwise), I would point out the multitude of unkempt, pot-bellied, high-school-is-my-highest-degree men that are out there making these judgments. The available choices for women are much fewer and far between then those for men. Let's not forget that. Men want perfection. Women are just looking for someone with a decent job that actually goes to church.

limagoose said...

06:00 PM
on May 13, 2012

Report Abuse

I didn't read reesecup's posting before writing mine, but I whole-heartily agree! Well-said.
Leave a Comment
Login to leave a comment.